Materialists is a fresh romantic comedy by filmmaker Celine Song, best known for Past Lives. The movie is about Lucy, a matchmaker in New York City who has built a successful career. Dakota Johnson plays her character. Lucy is stuck between two very different men—her charming but wealthy new partner, played by Pedro Pascal, and her struggling but sincere ex-boyfriend, portrayed by Chris Evans.
Even though Materialists might seem like a regular romantic comedy at first, it has a deeper and more thoughtful story underneath. It explores how money, success, and personal values shape love in today’s world. Instead of relying on clichés or over-the-top comedy, the film leans into meaningful dialogue and emotional choices.
Viewers see how Lucy struggles to find not just the right person, but the right path for herself.
Director Celine Song brings a thoughtful touch to the story, inspired by the work of classic romantic comedy filmmakers like Nora Ephron.
The film’s tone is quieter and more grounded than most comedies, giving space for its characters to grow and reflect. Audiences expecting lots of jokes may find it more serious, but many have praised its honesty and maturity.
The movie was released in June 2025 by A24 in the U.S. and Sony Pictures internationally. It saw a strong response at the box office, earning over $15 million globally, with impressive numbers in markets like India.
Fans have also shown strong interest in the chemistry between the lead actors, especially Dakota Johnson and Chris Evans.
Not everyone has responded the same way. Some critics say the film’s slower pace makes it feel less like a traditional romantic comedy. A real-life matchmaker even commented that the movie’s portrayal of the matchmaking world was more dramatic than realistic. Still, many believe it’s a refreshing change that gives romance the respect it deserves.
With beautiful performances, a modern setting, and a thoughtful look at love, Materialists offers something new for both rom-com lovers and those looking for a story with emotional depth.
Image Source: Nytimes.com
