Seven years after Bollywood's most expensive disaster, Aamir Khan has finally told the full truth — a Sholay-esque story was on the table, the script was strong, and then casting pressure slowly killed it.
There are flops, and then there are Thugs of Hindostan. Released on Diwali 2018 with India's biggest-ever opening-day collection, starring two of Hindi cinema's greatest legends together for the first time, backed by one of Bollywood's most powerful studios — and it still fell apart within 72 hours. The drop was so brutal it became a case study in how hype can become poison.
For years, Aamir Khan stayed largely quiet about what went wrong. Now, at a SCREEN Academy Masterclass at Whistling Woods International in Mumbai, he has offered the most candid post-mortem yet — and it is more interesting, more instructive, and more honest than anything he has said before.
What Aamir Khan Actually Said — And Why It Matters Now
Speaking at the Whistling Woods masterclass, Aamir was asked what drew him to the project. His answer was revealing: he fell in love not with the overall story — which he admitted was "normal" — but with the character of Firangi Mallah. "Firangi is such an unreliable character," he said. "You don't know when he's speaking the truth and when he's not. He's only about himself. I found him to be a very attractive and engaging character."
This admission is the first domino. The man who is celebrated as Bollywood's most strategic filmmaker — the actor who famously evaluates scripts holistically, not just his own role — had broken his own golden rule. He said yes to Thugs largely because of the character, not the script. And the script, he now confesses, was a moving target from the very beginning.
"For casting reasons, we kept changing the script. We should not have changed the script even if we didn't get the casting we wanted."— Aamir Khan, SCREEN Academy Masterclass, Whistling Woods International, Mumbai, 2026
That single sentence is perhaps the most important thing Aamir has said about his career in years. It cuts to the heart of a problem that is endemic in big-budget Bollywood: the script becomes a negotiating tool rather than a sacred document.
At a Glance — Thugs of Hindostan (2018)
- Director: Vijay Krishna Acharya (Victor)
- Cast: Amitabh Bachchan, Aamir Khan, Katrina Kaif, Fatima Sana Shaikh
- Production House: Yash Raj Films
- Estimated Budget: ₹200–300 crore
- India Net Collection: ₹151.30 crore
- Worldwide Gross: ₹327–335 crore
- Verdict: DISASTER (failed to recover production cost from theatrical run)
- Release Date: November 8, 2018 (Diwali)
The Sholay Connection — A Structurally Sound Blueprint, Abandoned
The most striking revelation from the masterclass was Aamir's comparison of Thugs of Hindostan to Sholay (1975) — not as flattery, but as a window into what the film could have been.
He explained the structural parallel: in Sholay, Sanjeev Kumar's Thakur has lost his family at the hands of Gabbar Singh and needs two hired guns — Jai and Veeru — to help him seek justice. The emotional anchor is Thakur's loss; the entertainment engine is Jai and Veeru's chemistry. In the original script of Thugs of Hindostan, a structurally identical formula existed: Zafira (Fatima Sana Shaikh) has lost her family at the hands of the East India Company and needs help. Firangi was meant to be that helper — the entertaining, morally ambiguous wildcard who comes in and turns the tide.
Sholay (1975) — Blueprint That Worked
Thakur (Sanjeev Kumar) loses his family → hires Jai & Veeru (Bachchan & Dharmendra) → emotional revenge arc anchors all entertainment. Emotional core intact. Supporting characters given room to shine.
Thugs of Hindostan (2018) — Blueprint Abandoned
Zafira (Fatima Sana Shaikh) loses her family → Firangi (Aamir Khan) arrives to help → but script rewrites pushed Firangi to centre stage, breaking the emotional structure and sidelining Zafira's arc.
The problem, as Aamir implicitly acknowledges, is that the film audiences saw was not the film Victor (Vijay Krishna Acharya) had originally written. Script changes made to accommodate casting reshuffled the emotional hierarchy of the story. Zafira's arc — which was meant to be the soul of the film — got compressed. Firangi, a supporting engine of entertainment, ended up carrying a weight the character was never built to hold.
A Confession That Took Seven Years
Aamir had previously spoken publicly about the failure, but always from a position of controlled accountability. In November 2018, days after the film collapsed, he stood before cameras and took "full responsibility" — a gesture that was admirable in its directness and deliberately vague about specifics. He said he was "not comfortable" discussing reasons publicly and called the film his "child."
That was accountability. What he offered at the Whistling Woods masterclass was something richer: analysis. He is now able to name the structural and creative decisions that unravelled the project — which is far more useful for the industry, for film students, and for audiences trying to understand why a film with every conceivable advantage still managed to fail.
"So when you've seen Thugs, you haven't seen the original script that Victor had written — because it went through a lot of changes."— Aamir Khan, SCREEN Academy Masterclass, 2026
The Box Office Anatomy: A Record Opening, A Catastrophic Cliff
The numbers tell their own story — and they are extraordinary in both directions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Day 5 figure — a 71% crash from opening day — is the number that haunts this film. It means audiences who watched on Day 1 told everyone they knew not to bother. In the era of instant social media reaction, a film with poor content cannot hide behind hype for more than 48 hours. Thugs lasted about three.
The Deeper Lesson: When Stars Become the Story
There is a pattern in big-budget Bollywood that Thugs of Hindostan exposes with surgical clarity. When a film assembles a cast of this magnitude — Amitabh Bachchan, Aamir Khan, Katrina Kaif, Fatima Sana Shaikh — the stars begin to exert gravitational pull on the script itself. Scenes are written or rewritten to showcase particular actors. Character arcs bend toward bankability rather than narrative logic.
Aamir's admission that the script kept changing "for casting reasons" suggests that this is precisely what happened. The original story, structured like Sholay, had a clean emotional hierarchy: one central figure of loss (Zafira), and a supporting engine of entertainment (Firangi). But as the project evolved and the star cast crystallised, the balance shifted. Firangi — Aamir's character — was pushed to the front. The emotional anchor of the story became a supporting subplot.
The resulting film felt, to most audiences, like a spectacular spectacle with no soul. The action was large. The sets — two enormous ships built in Malta, reportedly weighing 200,000 kg each — were jaw-dropping. But the story had nowhere emotionally compelling to go.
What Aamir Felt — And Didn't Feel — When It Failed
In a separate interview with Zee Music Company, Aamir drew a revealing contrast between his reactions to the two biggest failures of his recent career: Thugs of Hindostan and Laal Singh Chaddha (2022).
With Thugs, he says he was not upset when it failed — because he had not enjoyed making it, and his own creative instincts had told him during production that something was off. His taste and the audience's taste, as he put it, were aligned: neither enjoyed the film. He had, in fact, shared concerns with the director and producer before release, but felt bound to follow the production's direction.
Laal Singh Chaddha was the opposite. He genuinely believed in that film, felt the team had made something of quality, and was emotionally devastated when it failed. That distinction matters — because it tells you that Aamir's instincts about Thugs were sound, even while he was making it. The problem was not a failure of instinct but a failure of process: he did not act on what he knew.
'It’s very similar': Aamir Khan compares Thugs of Hindostan to Sholay, explains why he chose the film
— WION Showbiz (@WIONShowbiz) May 18, 2026
READ: https://t.co/09QXhOpvifhttps://t.co/09QXhOpvif
What Should Have Happened — And What Film Lovers Can Learn
Looking back with the clarity of seven years, the lesson from Thugs of Hindostan is not that big budgets fail or that period dramas don't work. Bajirao Mastani, Padmaavat, and RRR all prove that spectacle and scale, when rooted in a emotionally coherent story, can electrify audiences. The lesson is simpler and harder: the script is not a negotiating document. It is the foundation. Once you start bending it to accommodate casting, you are not making a film — you are making a deal.
Aamir Khan, of all filmmakers, knew this. He built his reputation on scripts first, character second, star power last. Lagaan, Rang De Basanti, Taare Zameen Par, 3 Idiots, Dangal — in every case, the story was non-negotiable and the performances served it. Thugs of Hindostan inverted that hierarchy, and it paid the price in full.
Where Does Aamir Khan Stand Today?
Seven years on from the Thugs debacle and three years after Laal Singh Chaddha, Aamir Khan is preparing for his next big-screen appearance with Sitaare Zameen Par, which has already drawn advance praise from figures like Sachin Tendulkar. The film has been described as a departure from spectacle — smaller in scale, intimate in emotion, focused on story over star power.
Whether it succeeds or not, what Aamir Khan said at Whistling Woods is itself a kind of success. It takes rare intellectual honesty to dismantle your own decisions in public, name the specific compromises that led to failure, and do so without blame-shifting. Directors, producers, and screenwriters across Bollywood would do well to print out that one sentence — "We should not have changed the script even if we didn't get the casting we wanted" — and pin it above their desks.
The story of Thugs of Hindostan is ultimately not about a bad film. It is about what happens when a good idea meets the wrong decisions. Sholay was possible. It just never made it to the screen.
Other Articles to Read:
