Blogs
Mradul Sharma

Author

  • Published: Jun 02 2025 03:06 PM
  • Last Updated: Jun 02 2025 03:06 PM

Google plans to challenge a US court ruling that found it held a monopoly in online search, saying the decision is unfair.


Newsletter

wave

Google has announced that it will appeal a recent decision from a U.S. court that found it acted unfairly in the way it runs its search engine business. The ruling came after a long investigation by the U.S. government, which said that Google used its power to stay ahead of competitors by making special deals with phone makers and browsers. These deals meant Google was set as the default search engine on most devices. Google now plans to challenge this ruling, saying it does not agree with the decision and believes it has done nothing wrong. The company says people choose Google because they like the service—not because they are forced to use it. This legal case is one of the biggest challenges Google has faced in the U.S. so far.

What the U.S. Court Said and Why It Matters

The U.S. court found that Google made it too hard for other search engines to succeed by controlling where its service appears. For example, Google signed agreements with companies like Apple and Samsung so that its search engine would be the default choice. The court said that because of these actions, smaller search companies could not get a fair chance. This ruling is important because it may lead to big changes in how people use the internet. If the court decides to force Google to stop making those deals or even change how it runs its business, it could affect millions of people and how they find information online. It also sends a strong message to other big tech companies that governments are paying closer attention to their actions.

Google’s Response to the Decision

Google disagrees with the court and says it did not break any rules. The company argues that people choose to use Google search because it works well, not because it is the only option. In its response, Google explained that users are free to change their search engine on most devices if they want to. It also says that being the default is not the same as forcing people to use their service. Google believes this ruling could hurt users by limiting their access to fast, useful search results. The company also says that making big changes to how its search engine works may slow down future improvements. That’s why Google is taking the case to a higher court to try and overturn the decision.

What Happens Next in the Case

The next step in the legal process is for the court to decide what actions Google must take, if the ruling is not overturned. These actions, called remedies, could include ending deals that make Google the default search engine or separating parts of Google’s business, such as advertising. These are major decisions that will take time. The final outcome might not be known until later in 2025. If Google wins its appeal, it may be allowed to continue its current business practices. But if it loses, the company could be forced to make big changes that affect not only its search engine but also other services like maps, shopping, and even YouTube.

What This Means for Internet Users and the Tech World

This legal case is not just about Google—it’s also about how people use the internet. If the court decides to limit Google’s control over search, people might see new search engines appear as default options. This could give users more choice and allow other companies to grow. On the other hand, some experts worry that changing how Google works could make it harder to get quick, accurate search results. Other tech companies are also watching closely because the outcome could affect how they make deals and grow their services. Whether you use Google or not, this case may shape the future of online search for everyone.

FAQ

Google is appealing a U.S. court ruling that found it violated antitrust laws by maintaining a monopoly in online search.

The U.S. Department of Justice claims that Google made deals to be the default search engine on devices, which unfairly blocked competitors.

Google says the ruling is wrong and believes its popularity comes from offering a better product, not from blocking competition.

If the appeal fails, Google may be forced to change business practices or even sell off parts of its advertising operations.

If Google is required to change how it works with other tech firms, users may see more options for search engines on their devices.

Search Anything...!