• Published: Jun 29 2026 03:35 PM
  • Last Updated: Jun 29 2026 04:14 PM

Siya allegedly took Rs 1 crore from Ketan for their wedding and gave it to Chetan. Full breakdown of the Lohagad murder investigation's latest revelations.



Newsletter

wave

Pune Police's financial trail uncovers how Rs 1 crore meant for wedding shopping became the fuel for an alleged murder conspiracy — and a possible motive far more calculated than a crime of passion

The Ketan Agarwal murder case took its most damning turn yet on June 29, when police sources revealed that Siya Goyal, the victim's own fiancée, allegedly extracted nearly Rs 1 crore from Ketan in the name of wedding shopping — and then handed the entire sum to Chetan Chaudhary, the man she was secretly involved with, to help "set up his career." It is a detail that reframes the entire case: not just a love triangle that ended in violence, but, investigators now suspect, a financially calculated plan that ran for months before the fatal push at Lohagad Fort on June 18.

This article pulls together everything verified so far — the money trail, the timeline of the murder, the legal proceedings, and what is likely to happen next in court — so you don't need to piece it together from five different headlines.

What Happened: The Rs 1 Crore Money Trail

According to police sources cited by NDTV, Goyal had sought around Rs 1 crore from Agarwal, claiming it was required for wedding shopping and other marriage-related expenses. But that money never went toward the wedding. Instead, she allegedly handed the entire amount to Chaudhary to help him establish his career and improve his financial condition, according to the IANS report. 

A separate report citing News18 corroborates this: Siya allegedly obtained Rs 1 crore from Ketan, claiming she needed the money for wedding shopping, and police allege she subsequently transferred the amount to Chetan, who intended to use the funds to establish his business. 

Regional outlets add a striking detail about Chaudhary's own stated intentions with the money. According to one report, Chetan said he would be in a better financial position within three years after receiving the money, and his plan was to meet Siya's family a few months after Ketan's death to discuss the marriage — suggesting the couple may have envisioned a future together that depended entirely on Ketan being out of the picture first.

It's worth noting: at this stage, these are police sources and investigative leads, not yet a fact established in court. The financial trail still needs to be backed by bank statements, transaction records, and forensic verification before it becomes formal evidence in the chargesheet.

Ketan Murder

Quick Facts: The Case So Far

Detail

Information

Victim

Ketan Agarwal, 25–26, Pune-based real estate businessman from Pimpri-Chinchwad

Main accused

Siya Goyal (20), fiancée of the victim

Co-accused

Chetan Chaudhary (22), Siya's alleged lover

Alleged amount diverted

Approx. Rs 1 crore, claimed as "wedding shopping" money

Date of murder

June 18, 2026

Location

Lohagad Fort, near Lonavala, Pune district

Method

Pushed off a cliff (~400-foot gorge) near Vinchu Kata ridge

Date of arrest

June 23, 2026

Charges

Section 103 (murder) and Section 61(2) (criminal conspiracy), Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

Special Public Prosecutor

Ujjwal Nikam, Rajya Sabha MP, known for the 26/11 Kasab case

Trial status

Fast-track trial approved by Maharashtra government

Why It Matters: From "Accidental Fall" to Premeditated Conspiracy

When Ketan Agarwal died on June 18, the incident was initially treated as a tragic accident — a man losing his footing while taking photographs in strong winds at a popular trekking spot. That changed quickly. Investigators grew suspicious, and within days the case was reclassified as murder.

This Rs 1 crore detail matters because it does something most "love triangle" murder narratives don't: it gives police a financial motive trail that can be independently verified through bank records, UPI transactions, and account statements — evidence that is far harder to contest in court than testimony alone. If confirmed through forensic audit, it strengthens the conspiracy charge against both Siya and Chetan by showing intent and planning that predates the murder by months, not days.

It also explains, in part, why investigators believe the crime was "meticulously planned." According to police, the duo had agreed on a pre-decided signal — Goyal sitting down on the pretext of drinking water or tying her shoelaces — to indicate to Chaudhary that the moment to push Agarwal had arrived. Police believe this signal served a dual purpose: alerting Chaudhary while also keeping Goyal at a safe distance, reducing the chance Agarwal could grab her while falling.

Call data is reportedly central to the prosecution's case. Sources said Goyal allegedly spoke to Chaudhary roughly 34 minutes before the incident, which investigators suspect was a final confirmation call before the murder. 

The Bigger Picture: A Timeline of Premeditation

Piecing together verified reports, here is how the day of the murder reportedly unfolded, according to a detailed reconstruction:

Stage

What Reportedly Happened

Hours before

Chaudhary disabled his mobile data to avoid creating a GPS trail via cell towers

Alibi setup

He left his phone at his shop and told employees to answer calls, creating a false impression that he never left

Travel

Chaudhary reportedly rode a scooter roughly 90 km, deliberately bypassing toll plazas to avoid camera detection

Disguise

He wore a heavy winter hoodie despite 33°C heat — later a key clue, since it stood out on CCTV footage

The signal

At the cliff near Vinchu Kata ridge, Goyal sat down — under the pretext of tying her shoelaces — to signal Chaudhary while keeping herself out of Agarwal's reach

The act

Chaudhary stepped out from hiding and pushed Agarwal off the cliff

Cover-up

Chaudhary's phone came back online after 10 hours and 40 minutes — a gap investigators found suspicious

Evidence destruction

Both accused reportedly deleted chats and recycle-bin data from their phones before and after the crime

Importantly, this wasn't necessarily the first attempt. One report notes that investigators are also examining a failed murder attempt allegedly made in May, which — if substantiated — would push the conspiracy timeline back even further than the June 18 incident itself. 

Police also reportedly recreated the crime scene. On Sunday, police took Siya to Lohagad Fort and used a dummy to reconstruct the sequence of events, with officials saying the accused had admitted to scouting the location in advance and even conducting a "practice" run. 

A Family Pressured Into a Wedding?

Beyond the money and the murder mechanics, investigators are exploring a possible psychological motive. During questioning, Siya allegedly told investigators she did not want to marry Ketan and conspired with Chetan to kill him because she believed calling off the wedding would bring disgrace to her family. 

This is corroborated by separate reporting: police suspect Siya was not ready to marry at this stage of her life and was facing pressure from her family to go ahead with the wedding. One investigative report adds further texture, noting that investigators allege Siya's parents were aware of her closeness to Chaudhary since a January community cricket match, but the family reportedly ignored her feelings to secure the marriage, motivated by the Agarwal family's greater wealth. 

The scale of the planned wedding adds weight to this theory. Siya's father has publicly disputed the wildest claims about cost, clarifying to reporters: "It is true that the wedding was to take place in Udaipur. The hotel charged around Rs 81,000 per couple per day, and we had booked 70 rooms. Our total expenditure was not more than Rs 3 crore." This is a useful corrective — some viral reports had claimed figures as high as Rs 17 crore with chartered planes, which the family has pushed back against. 

What Happens Next: The Legal Road Ahead

As of June 29, the case has reached a procedural turning point. A magistrate court near Pune had remanded both Siya Goyal and Chetan Chaudhary to seven days of police custody on June 23, after invoking charges of murder and criminal conspiracy under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. That custody period expired on Monday, June 29, prompting a fresh court hearing where investigators sought an extension while the defence pushed back. 

Notably, Siya's lawyer, Advocate Ashutosh Srivastava, argued ahead of the hearing that his client had cooperated fully with the investigation and that the court should consider sending her to judicial custody instead, given that she is a 20-year-old woman. Chaudhary's counsel had earlier made a separate legal argument during the first remand hearing — that the case was originally treated as accidental death, and that the murder and conspiracy charges were added only about ten days later, making the arrest one based on suspicion rather than direct evidence. 

On the investigative side, momentum is clearly building. The Maharashtra government has approved a fast-track trial and appointed Senior Advocate and Rajya Sabha MP Ujjwal Nikam — known for prosecuting 26/11 attacker Ajmal Kasab — as Special Public Prosecutor. Forensic teams have also been active: Chaudhary's two-wheeler, along with a hoodie and headphones he wore on the day of the crime, have been seized and forensically examined, though detailed findings from that examination have not yet been disclosed. 

Other Articles to Read:

FAQ

Ketan Agarwal, a 25–26-year-old Pune realtor, died after being pushed off a cliff at Lohagad Fort on June 18. Police allege his fiancée Siya Goyal and her boyfriend Chetan Chaudhary conspired to murder him.

Police sources allege Siya took around Rs 1 crore from Ketan under the pretext of wedding shopping and transferred the full amount to Chetan, reportedly to help him build his career and finances.

Not yet in court. This is currently based on police sources and investigative leads reported by NDTV and News18; formal confirmation would require verified bank or transaction records presented as evidence.

Both face charges under Section 103 (murder) and Section 61(2) (criminal conspiracy) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Senior Advocate and Rajya Sabha MP Ujjwal Nikam, known for prosecuting 26/11 Mumbai attack accused Ajmal Kasab, has been appointed as Special Public Prosecutor for the fast-track trial.

Police allege she sat down — under the pretext of drinking water or tying her shoelaces — to signal Chetan that it was time to push Ketan off the cliff, while also keeping herself out of his reach.

Police custody for both accused expired on June 29; a court hearing was held to decide on further remand or judicial custody, while investigators continue forensic and financial verification.

Search Anything...!