The Jerusalem Question: Why Recognizing Israel's Capital Matters
The UK's current stance on Jerusalem is complex. Whitehall acknowledges Israel's control over West Jerusalem but considers East Jerusalem under Israeli military occupation. This means the UK doesn't recognize Israel's sovereignty over any part of its declared capital, keeping its embassy in Tel Aviv. But a growing number of voices are calling for a change, arguing that recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital is not just a reasonable diplomatic move, but the right thing to do.
A City Steeped in History and Conflict
This isn't a new debate. For years, politicians have argued over the status of Jerusalem, often with entrenched positions and unwavering certainties about the conflict. Recently, a letter from prominent Conservative figures urged the UK government to recognize a Palestinian state. This predictable move highlights the ongoing political stalemate.
- The core issue: Jerusalem is the seat of Israel's government, parliament, and supreme court. Israel considers it its unified capital. However, the eastern part was occupied by Jordan before being retaken by Israel in 1967.
- A religious crossroads: Jerusalem holds immense religious significance for Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Under Israeli control, the city has arguably seen greater freedom of worship for all three faiths.
- International deadlock: Most countries, including the UK, refuse to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital, demanding Israel cede East Jerusalem to a future Palestinian state. This stance, however, often feels more like resentment towards Israel's effective governance than a genuine concern for Palestinian rights.
Opponents of recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital will call it a unilateral move, prejudicial to the peace process. However, the same accusations could be leveled at recognizing a Palestinian state – and with greater validity given the lack of a functioning Palestinian authority. The US, for example, has recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital without defining its boundaries, offering a model the UK could follow.
Why Recognize Jerusalem Now?
Recognizing Jerusalem is not merely about aligning with reality; it’s about strengthening diplomatic ties and acknowledging the deep spiritual connection British Jews have with the city. In a time of rising antisemitism, this act could also demonstrate solidarity with a community facing increasing threats.
The rise of anti-Zionism: Across the West, anti-Zionism is gaining traction, pushing the boundaries of acceptable discourse. The recent controversy surrounding BBC presenter Gary Lineker, who shared a video containing an antisemitic rat emoji used to denigrate Zionists, underscores this concerning trend. Lineker’s actions sparked widespread outrage and calls for his dismissal. This incident is just one example of a growing wave of antisemitism disguised as anti-Zionism. This type of rhetoric fuels Palestinian rejectionism and contributes to domestic extremism.
Recognizing Jerusalem would send a powerful message: Despite the threats and hatred, Israel, and its claim to Jerusalem, will not be erased.
Conclusion: A Necessary Step
Recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital is a complex issue with significant implications. While concerns about the peace process are valid, the current UK position is arguably outdated and fails to acknowledge the reality on the ground. Recognizing Jerusalem would align the UK’s foreign policy with the reality that Jerusalem is the seat of the Israeli government, while also offering a powerful statement of support for Israel at a time of heightened antisemitism. It is a necessary and ultimately just step.
